Home | People | Research | Publications | Demos |
News | Jobs |
Prospective
Students |
About | Internal |
|
|
Below we illustrate semantic classification results obtained on the Corel database, and a database of personal photographs assembled by Kodak, and hand-labeled for concepts such as indoor/outdoor, sky, grass, etc. More details can be found in the ICIP'02 paper [ps][pdf]. |
|
Corel - 15 semantic classes |
|
Kodak - Results for sky detection and indoor/outdoor classification |
|
|
|
Example errors |
|
Frequently one learns more about the goodness of a classifier by inspecting the errors than from statistics such as those above. Below are examples of typical errors on Kodak. | |
18.5% of the indoors images classified as outdoors |
|
|
|
These errors tend to be either 1) images that contain significant amounts of outdoors (e.g. large windows) or 2) a large ground plane. | |
15.6% of the outdoors images classified as indoors |
|
|
|
These errors tend to images that would require a substantial amount of "high-level" knowledge about scenes, people, houses, etc. to classify correctly (e.g. "porches look like living rooms but they have a wooden deck instead of a wooden floor", "porch chairs are different than living room chairs", and so on). | |
15.6% of the sky false positives |
|
|
|
These errors tend to be images that have large smooth areas with colors that are similar to those of sky or clouds. | |
29.4% of the sky misses |
|
|
|
These errors tend to be images that have very small regions of unoccluded sky. | |
Contact: | Nuno Vasconcelos |
©
SVCL